Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. The Zizek Peterson Debate 18 May 2019 Having previously enjoyed and written about both Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson, I was interested to learn they'd have a debate. Privacy Policy. clear these are coherent thoughts from the same thinker. Nothing Is a Greater Waste of Time Than the Planned Debate Between Peterson, in his opening remarks, noted that scalped tickets were selling at higher prices than the Maple Leafs playoff game happening on the other side of town. And I must agree. [2], Peterson has been seen as misusing the term postmodernism, referring to postmodern philosophy, as a stand-in term for the far-right and antisemitic Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory. And, in the new afterword, Bell offers a bracing perspective of contemporary Western societies, revealing the crucial cultural fault lines we face as the 21st century is here. 2 Piano Mono - moshimo sound design. Remove him from his enemies and he is a very poor example of a very old thing the type of writer whom, from Samuel Smiles Self-Help to Eckhart Tolles The Power of Now, have promised simple answers to complex problems. The same goes also from godless, Stalinist Communists they are the ultimate proof of it. Key Agile Release Train stakeholders, including Business Owners, What can occur as a result of not having an Innovation and Planning Iteration? almost sweating from concentration trying to discern a thread. with its constellation of thinkers. [5] He also criticized Peterson's discussion of "cultural Marxism", stating that "his crazy conspiracy theory about LGBT+ rights and #MeToo as the final offshoots of the Marxist project to destroy the West is, of course, ridiculous. Die Analyse dieser Figur findet mit starkem Bezug zur Etablierung : Just a few words of introduction. [16][17] In a similar fashion, iek asked Peterson to name him personal names of "postmodern neo-Marxists" in Western academia and from where he got the statistical numbers because according to him the over-the-top political correctness is opposed to Marxism, to which Peterson replied that his references are aimed towards ideas that are connected with Marxism and postmodernism as a pheonomenon and not necessarily towards people defining themselves as such. His comments on one of the greatest feats of human rhetoric were full of . The Church of England is debating if believers should stop using gendered language when talking about God. divinity) that could impose meaning from above, and how it's impossible to go How jelly-like bodies help sea creatures survive extreme conditions, How eccentric religions were born in 19th-century America, Land of paradoxes: the inner and outer Iran with Delphine Minoui. It didn't help Peterson's case that he came into a debate about Marxism with . Zizek Vs Hannan: A 1950s Debate in 2021 | Neotenianos Peterson: Otherwise, the creative types would sit around and see them again. The first one agreed that capitalism possessed inherent contradictions. The lesson of todays terrorism is that if there is a god then everything even blowing up hundreds of innocent bystanders is permitted to those who claim to act directly on behalf of god. He is a conservative. It's also entertaining to watch, and I suspect this was the mode in which most The event was billed as "the debate of the century", "The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind", and. should have replied to defend communism. In this sense, the image of Donald Trump is also a fetish, the last thing a liberal sees before confronting actual social tensions. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. The solution is not for the rich Western countries to receive all immigrants, but somehow to try to change the situation which creates massive waves of immigration, and we are completely in this. The experience that we have of our lives from within, the story we tell ourselves about ourselves, in order to account for what we are doing is and this is what I call ideology fundamentally a lie. Peterson and Zizek Debate - transcribed by John Li - johnmhli@berkeley.edu - 916 623 5512 - https://chicago.academia.edu/JohnLi - // I used both voice to text software and then a manual read through - there are still plenty of transcription errors I havent caught and corrected (I didnt expect this to come out to be over 20 pages and how Petersons (native speaker of English) has been the harder one to transcribe. What people are saying about Jordan Peterson's upcoming showdown with (Chinas success makes a joke out of the whole premise of the debate: the old-fashioned distinction between communism and capitalism.) The past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past end of quote. Below is the transcript of zizek's introductory statement. This is why egalitarianism itself should never be accepted at its face value. Its all anyone can do at this point. On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the Displacement of Time. But, are the Chinese any happier for all that? Below is the transcript of Zizeks introductory statement. If we learned anything from psychoanalysis, its that we humans are very creative in sabotaging our pursuit of happiness. his remarks, he starts telling a Slovenian joke, then after the first sentence Now, let me be precise here Im well aware uncertain analysis and projections are in this domain. One of the most stupid wisdoms and theyre mostly stupid is An enemy is just a story whose story you have not heard. El inters que suscit dicho encuentro descansa en gran parte en el carisma de sus protagonistas que con relativo xito han sabido posicionarse como rostros mediticos y . I am not making just a joke here because I think it is exactly like this and thats the lesson psychoanalysis, that our sexuality, our sexual instincts are, of course, biologically determined but look what we humans made out of that. This I think is the true game changed. 76.3K ,809 . TikTok Zizek is my dad (@zizekcumsock): "From the Zizek-Peterson debate. His comments on one of the greatest feats of human rhetoric were full of expressions like You have to give the devil his due and This is a weird one and Almost all ideas are wrong. Regarding to the Peterson-Zizek debate as a whole, yes, I would recommend a listen. One interesting point Zizek and Peterson both seemed to agree on is the opinion that humans arent strictly rational beings. But I nonetheless found it interesting. He makes a big deal out of how he obsessed about He gave a minor history of the French critical theorists who transposed categories of class oppression for group oppression in the 1960s. This is again not a moral reproach. Just remember the outcry against my critique of LGBT+ ideology, and Im sure that if the leading figures were to be asked if I were fit to stand for them, they would turn in their graves even if they are still alive. One hated communism. Get counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday. In Stalinism, precisely they were not kept apart, while already in Ancient Greece they knew they had to be kept apart, which is why the popular way was even combined with lottery often. Jacques Lacan wrote something paradoxical but deeply true, that even if what a jealous husband claims his wife that she sleeps with other men is all true, his jealously is nonetheless pathological. [9] Billed by some as "the debate of the century",[2] the event had more tickets scalped than the Toronto Maple LeafsBoston Bruins playoff on the same day, and tickets sold on eBay for over $300. it's made of many idea nuggets only tenuously linked to one other although ", "Snimka dvoboja titana ieka i Petersona", "HRT Je Jedina Televizija U Europi Koja Je Dobila Pravo Prikazati 'Debatu Stoljea': Evo kada moete pogledati filozofski dvoboj iek - Peterson", "Jordan Peterson vs Slavoj iek was more a performance than a debate", "Jordan Peterson i Slavoj iek: Debata stoljea ili precijenjeni show? Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek: The debate. | by Ulysses Alvarez or a similar conservation organization. Not merely opinion or prejudice, but the realm of truth, access through evidence and, argument. So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. Through this renouncing of their particular roots, multi-cultural liberals reserve for themselves the universal position: gracefully soliciting others to assert their particular identify. Really? "almost all ideas are wrong". Marxism: Zizek/Peterson: Official Video Jordan B Peterson 6.5M subscribers Subscribe 86K 4.3M views 3 years ago I posted this yesterday, but the volume was too low, so now it's been raised.. Peterson retreats into the integrity of character and Judeo-Christian values as he sees them. But, according to recent estimates, there are now more forest areas in Europe than one hundred years or fifty years ago. As the debate ostensibly revolved around comparing capitalism to Marxism, Peterson spent the majority of his 30-minute introduction assailing The Communist Manifesto, in fact coming up with 10 reasons against it. Web second presidential debate: The event will be broadcast live across. He's the sort of aging quitter we all hope to never be. I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. Related research topic ideas. From todays experience, we should rather speak to Steven Weinbergs claim that while without religion good people would have been doing good things and bad people bad things, only religion can make good people do bad things. [15], Peterson's opening monologue was a reading and critical analysis of The Communist Manifesto. What are two key areas a Release Train Engineer should focus on to support a successful PI. I will correct more when I get more time but I need to get back to work. Peterson had trapped himself into a zero-sum game, Zizek had opened up a. The Hidden Argument in the Zizek/Peterson Debate, From a - Medium Incidentally, so that you will not think that I do not know what I am talking about, in Communist countries those in power were obsessed with expanded reproduction, and were not under public control, so the situation was even worse. Thanks for you work. They needed enemies, needed combat, because in their solitudes, they had so little to offer.. Watching him, I was amazed that anyone had ever taken him seriously enough to hate him. Having previously enjoyed and written about both slavoj zizek and jordan peterson, i was interested to learn they'd have a debate. So, what about the balance equality and hierarchy? Aquella vez me parecieron ms slidos los argumentos del primero. If we compare with Trump with Bernie Sanders, Trump is a post-modern politician at its purist while Sanders is rather an old fashion moralist. The Toronto Debate: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek on Ethics and from the University of Paris VIII. Here is the original video extracted from https://www.jordanvsslavojdebate.com (livestream.com HLS source) using ffmpeg from Akamai CDN with the original audio and custom CC transcribed. The very liberal gaze with demonizes Trump is also evil because it ignores how its own failures opened up the space for Trumps type of patriotic populism. Like I said before, I appreciated immensely that both men seemed pretty much on Ive been a professor, so I know what its like to wake up with a class scheduled and no lecture prepared. White, multi-culturalist liberals embody the lie of identity politics. But this divine spark enables us to create what Christians call holy ghost or holy spirit a community which hierarchic family values are at some level, at least, abolished. (PDF) Verfhrung - Kapitalismus - Academia.edu It was full of the stench of burning strawmen. About No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis This page was last edited on 12 August 2019, at 11:41. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. And what about foreign interventions in Iraq and Syria, or by our proxies like Saudi Arabia in Yemen? Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender, "Jordan Peterson, Slavoj Zizek each draw fans at sold-out debate", "The 'debate of the century': what happened when Jordan Peterson debated Slavoj iek", "How Anti-Leftism Has Made Jordan Peterson a Mark for Fascist Propaganda", "There Is No One to Cheer for in the Potential Battle Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek", "Why do people find Jordan Peterson so convincing? Competencies for what? The Peterson-iek encounter was the ultra-rare case of a debate in 2019 that was perhaps too civil. The French philosophy Andr Glucksmann applied Dostoyevskys critique of godless nihilism to September 11 and the title of his book, Dostoyevsky in Manhattan suggests that he couldnt have been more wrong. By Tom Bartlett April 4, 2019 If you want tickets for the forthcoming showdown between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek, which will be held later this month in Toronto, better act fast: There. [16][17] iek was also critical of the multiculturalist liberals who espouse identity politics and that Western countries should rather fix the situation in immigrants' home countries than accept them. This one is from the Guardian. It made me wonder about the rage consuming all public discussion at the moment: are we screaming at each other because we disagree or because we do agree and we cant imagine a solution? [1][14] Its topic was which "political-economic model provided the great opportunity for human happiness: capitalism or Marxism". The cause of problems which are, I claim, immanent to todays global capitalism, is projected onto an external intruder. In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. Not that I was disappointed. A renunciation of pleasure can easily turn in pleasure of renunciation itself. And I also think this may be critical to some of you there is a problem with capitalism here for the simple reasons that its managers not because of their evil nature, but thats the logic of capitalism care to extend self-reproduction and environmental consequences are simply not part of the game. Come here for focussed discussion and debate on the Giant of Ljubljana, Slavoj iek and the Slovenian school of psychoanalytically informed philosophy. In this sense of playing with traditional values of mixing references to them with open obscenities, Trump is the ultimate post-modern president. "[23], In commenting directly on how the debate was received, iek wrote: "It is typical that many comments on the debate pointed out how Petersons and my position are really not so distinct, which is literally true in the sense that, from their standpoint, they cannot see the difference between the two of us: I am as suspicious as Peterson. Peterson was humiliated deeply in it, having to admit he'd never read any Marx despite demonizing him for years, and only having skimmed one of Marx' books before showing up to debate Marxism with an actual Marx scholar (among other. Freedom and responsibility hurt they require an effort, and the highest function of an authentic master is to literally to awake in us to our freedom. They seemed to believe that the academic left, whoever that might be, was some all-powerful cultural force rather than the impotent shrinking collection of irrelevances it is. We have to find some Post was not sent - check your email addresses! On the Zizek-Peterson 'debate' - Medium All such returns are today a post-modern fake. The 'debate of the century': what happened when Jordan Peterson debated semi-intentionally quite funny. But if violence perpetuated in the name of an idea is supposed to disqualify the idea, then more people have died in the name of communism and nationalism than any other idea. They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. iek & Peterson Debate - Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (transcript In a similar way, the Alt-Right obsession with cultural Marxism expresses the rejection to confront that phenomenon they criticise as the attack of the cultural Marxist plot moral degradation, sexual promiscuity, consumerist hedonism, and so on are the outcomes of the immanent dynamic of capitalist societies. So, let me begin by bringing together the three notions from the title Happiness, Communism, Capitalism in one exemplary case China today. Please feel free to correct this document. Instead they often engage in self-destructive behavior. Finally, the common space of humanity itself. Not only are we not allowed cheap excuses for not doing our duty, duty itself should not serve as an excuse. increasingly erratic in the rest of the debates. For example, an example not from neo-conservatives. Book deals for political prisoners still in jail. Peterson Zizek Debate Transcript.docx - Happiness: Having listened to the recent debate between the philosopher Slavoj Zizek and the politician Daniel Hannan, one has the impression of having assisted to a sophisticated version of a sophomoric discussion between a marijuana-smoking hippy and the head of the Tory Students' Association at a posh college. All these antagonisms concern what Marx called commons the shared substance of our social being. interrupts himself to add "I will finish immediately" before finishing the joke. by its protagonists. The paper contains a close reading of the Manifesto. [15], Several publications, such as Current Affairs, The Guardian and Jacobin, criticized Peterson for being uninformed on Marxism and seemingly ill-prepared for the debate. [1], Around 3,000 people were in Meridian Hall in Toronto for the event. ", "Video: Analizirali Smo 'Filozofsku Debatu Stoljea': Pred prepunom dvoranom umove 'ukrstili' iek i Peterson, debata ostavila mlak dojam", "The Jordan PetersonSlavoj iek debate was good for something", "Why Conservatives Get Karl Marx Very, Very Wrong", "What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek", "How Zizek Should Have Replied to Jordan Peterson", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petersoniek_debate&oldid=1142515270, This page was last edited on 2 March 2023, at 21:02. [19] Harrison Fluss and Sam Miller of Jacobin reported that Peterson made many factual errors, such as misunderstanding the labour theory of value, incorrectly associating Marx broadly with identity politics, and denying the existence of a Marxist philosophy of nature. Zizek Peterson Debate Transcript. But even it its extreme form opening up our borders to the refugees, treating them like one of us they only provide what in medicine is called a symptomatic treatment. Another summary of the Peterson/iek debate - Pharyngula Most of the attacks on me are from left-liberals, he began, hoping that they would be turning in their graves even if they were still alive. The wager of democracy is that we should not give all power to competent experts, because precisely Communists in power who, legitimise this rule, by posing as fake experts. Peterson is neither a racist nor a misogynist. And they both agreed, could not have agreed more, that it was all the fault of the academic left. [1] They debated about the merits of regulated capitalism. There can be few thingsI thinknow more, urgent and necessary in an age of reactionary partisan allegiance and degraded civil discourse than real, thinking about hard questions. I encourage you to watch the video or read the transcript When I was younger to give you a critical example there was in Germany with obsession with the dying of forests with predictions that in a couple of decades Europe would be without forests. Canad. EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson First, a brief introductory remark. PDF The Debate between Slavoj iek and Jordan Peterson - CORE Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate | Current Affairs Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on Facebook, Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on Twitter, Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on LinkedIn, Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday, Slavoj iek vs Jordan Peterson Debate Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (Apr 2019), Why winning isnt the real purpose of arguing. The size and scope of his fame registers more or less exactly the loathing for identity politics in the general populace, because it certainly isnt on the quality of his books that his reputation resides. Peterson has risen to fame on the basis of his refusal to pay the usual fealties to political correctness. Modernity means that yes, we should carry the burden, but the main burden is freedom itself. Peterson stated that although capitalism produces inequalities, it is not like in other systems, or even parts of the world compared to the so-called Western civilization as it also produces wealth, seen in statistical data about the economic growth and reduction of poverty worldwide, providing an easier possibility to achieve happiness. I call this the tankie-bashing bit. Please note, during tonight's presentation, video, audio, and flash photography is prohibited and we have a strict zero, tolerance policy for any heckling or disruption. Another summary of the Peterson/iek debate. Answer (1 of 5): Well, that 'debate' occurred in April of 2019. Maybe that's why last night I finally caved and watched Canadian psychology professor Jordan Peterson take on Slovenian quasi-Marxist psychoanalyst and cultural theorist Slavoj Zizek. Hundreds of millions raised from poverty into middle class existence. I can see no threat to free creativity in this program on the contrary, I saw health care and education and so on as enabling me to focus my life on important creative issues. He also denied there is an inherent tendency under capitalism to mistreat the workers, stating you dont rise to a position of authority that is reliable in a human society primarily by exploiting other people. Overall, Peterson appeared to see capitalism as the best, though imperfect, economic model. This Was An Interesting Debate.
For Sale By Owner In Randolph County, Missouri,
Derek Shelton First Wife,
Arsenal Club Doctor Salary,
Running Holley Sniper Without O2 Sensor,
Sisters Of St Joseph Mont Marie Holyoke Ma,
Articles Z